CO129-410 - Governor Sir May - 1914 [3-5] — Page 29

arguments against extradition

The plain facts

an

that the fugitive

convate this own use

mongs

Leboring

Я

to the Rovincial [p. bat inned to him the temporary uhl for, botted to Whone with wre preeeds.

?

Coby CA. Htill them to mistruct

their solv: to appear agamist the application for heart &appeal.

JR15/4/44.

Also send cop

h Tennyso

Fiddes Th Solom

Sr. R. Funday

hst

Jo

Winn

15

1

uite

ch 1

13374

alonce

Но брусе

idar

an Ahe comment could

-

LE

r.

The question paramos

to Jo. 4.

Rup

1614114

hot to bran

His with centring

inhard under

whether or

#

appl".

100

h

lefarmed

for

from

# apps".

to depend upon

sick of the Privy Council's entertaining

So far

thanh chu

28

I can

judy from

th

export

in fiven

It C.Si judgment

extero) the wit is perhaps hardly great caugh

to justify

Finder.

expense of retaining

RAT

24/4114

Li R.

The judgments in this case are extremely complicated adeal freat number of positi by ser ingenuity of

The

with a

raised by

Rispet Shorty nu

as follows

Aiz

seems to have been

Case Leens

on July 21. Kerangtung Gather

1563

The fovemer of thin

Province (in whi

& xo

Canton is situated & of

The Fregiture Cappellant).

-dent

어

Treasury);

-lamation

ment of

iss ned

Whart

Superinten

proe

A

repudiating the ferem.

guan-

shi Kai

then president pro tem: of

chinese Republie

ий

This proclamation

was to some extent taken up b ther Previces

On July 28th quan

-Shi. Kai issued an

who

nude dimising

however staye

Jovemen

thereabouts.cn

and continued to act as

to Jorimer

til Aug. 4